Kenrick Hamilton v. TSA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000017906-2], denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000016877-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01413-TSE-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000044109]. Mailed to: K Hamilton. [17-1114]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1114 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/17/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1114 KENRICK HAMILTON, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. TRANSPORTATION Capital, SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Office of Human Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01413-TSE-IDD) Submitted: March 14, 2017 Before FLOYD and Circuit Judge. HARRIS, Decided: Circuit Judges, and March 17, 2017 DAVIS, Senior Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenrick Hamilton, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Sara Levenson, R. Joseph Sher, Lauren Anne Wetzler, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1114 Doc: 13 Filed: 03/17/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kenrick Hamilton appeals the district court’s dismissing his complaint and denying reconsideration. orders We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss deny appeal leave for to proceed the in reasons forma stated pauperis by the and district the court. Hamilton v. Transp. Sec. Admin., No. 1:16-cv-01413-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Dec. 16 & 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?