William Davis, Jr. v. W. Earl Britt
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [1000064778-2], denying Motion to remand case [1000040255-2]; denying Motion for other relief [1000040264-2], denying Motion for other relief [1000040261-2], denying Motion for other relief [1000040256-2] Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03211-BA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: William Scott Davis Jr. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL P. O. Box 388 Farmville, VA 23901-0000. [17-1119]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
W. EARL BRITT; JAMES C. FOX; JAMES C. DEVER, III; LOUISE W.
FLANAGAN; TERRENCE W. BOYLE; MALCOLM J. HOWARD; JAMES C.
GATES; REBECCA BEACH SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Max O. Cogburn, Jr., District Judge. (5:16-ct-03211-BA)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: May 30, 2017
Pg: 2 of 2
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order rejecting his
postjudgment filings as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Britt,
No. 5:16-ct-03211-BA (E.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 2016).
We deny all of Davis’ pending
motions, including his motions to remand and to appoint a guardian ad litem. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?