Vincente Jarrett v. Hampton Roads Shipping Assoc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000019086-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000011952-2] Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00601-RGD-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087993]. Mailed to: Jennifer Lynn Eaton; Vincente Jarrett. [17-1120]
Appeal: 17-1120
Doc: 12
Filed: 05/25/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1120
VINCENTE JARRETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:16-cv-00601-RGD-RJK)
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Decided: May 25, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vincente Jarrett, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Taylor Buckius, Jennifer Lynn Eaton,
VANDEVENTER BLACK, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1120
Doc: 12
Filed: 05/25/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Vincente Jarrett appeals the district court’s order granting Hampton Roads
Shipping Association’s motion to dismiss. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jarrett’s informal
brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Jarrett has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th
Cir. 2014). Accordingly, we grant Jarrett leave to proceed informa pauperis and affirm
the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?