Marto Fahardo v. Jefferson Sessions, III
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A201-299-119 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [17-1121]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
MARTO FAHARDO, a/k/a Marto Doe, a/k/a Marto Fajardo, a/k/a Marto Aroldo
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 29, 2017
Decided: September 13, 2017
Before TRAXLER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnedo S. Valera, LAW OFFICES OF VALERA & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, Virginia,
for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Keith I. McManus,
Assistant Director, Rosanne M. Perry, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Marto Fahardo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s
denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture. * We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of
Fahardo’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record
evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings,
see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s
decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Fahardo (B.I.A. Dec. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
The Board issued this order after this court granted the Attorney General’s
unopposed motion to remand Fahardo’s case to the Board for further consideration.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?