Marto Fahardo v. Jefferson Sessions, III

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A201-299-119 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000154751].. [17-1121]

Appeal: 17-1121

Doc: 26

Filed: 09/13/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1121

MARTO FAHARDO, a/k/a Marto Doe, a/k/a Marto Fajardo, a/k/a Marto Aroldo
Diaz Fajardo,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: August 29, 2017

Decided: September 13, 2017

Before TRAXLER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arnedo S. Valera, LAW OFFICES OF VALERA & ASSOCIATES, Fairfax, Virginia,
for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Keith I. McManus,
Assistant Director, Rosanne M. Perry, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1121

Doc: 26

Filed: 09/13/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Marto Fahardo, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of an order
of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s
denial of his requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture. * We have reviewed the record, including the transcript of
Fahardo’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record
evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings,
see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s
decision, see INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Fahardo (B.I.A. Dec. 29, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

*

The Board issued this order after this court granted the Attorney General’s
unopposed motion to remand Fahardo’s case to the Board for further consideration.

2