Richard Polidi v. Cheshire Parker Schneider


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01534-TSE-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000163352]. Mailed to: Richard Polidi. [17-1122, 17-1124]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1122 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1122 RICHARD POLIDI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHESHIRE PARKER SCHNEIDER & BRYAN, PLLC; ALAN SCHNEIDER; JOHN DOES 1-3, Defendants - Appellees. No. 17-1124 RICHARD POLIDI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CARMEN HOYME BANNON, in each of her official and individual capacities; DOUGLAS BELL, Defendants - Appellees, and THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, an Agency of the State of North Carolina; WAYNE TRUAX, in each of his official and individual capacities; KATHERINE JEAN, in each of her official and individual capacities; JOHN DOES 1-10; JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. Appeal: 17-1122 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01534-TSE-MSN; 1:16-cv01535-TSE-MSN) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 28, 2017 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Polidi, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-1122 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/28/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Richard Polidi appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2012) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his Motion to Set Aside Order and for a New Hearing. * We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Polidi v. Cheshire Parker Schneider & Bryan, PLLC, No. 1:16-cv-01534-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2016; Jan. 25, 2017); Polidi v. Bannon, No. 1:16-cv-01535-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 2016; filed Dec. 29, 2016 & entered Dec. 30, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * The district court declined to exercise jurisdiction over Polidi’s state law claims, dismissing them without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (2012). 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?