Richard Polidi v. Cheshire Parker Schneider
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01534-TSE-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Richard Polidi. [17-1122, 17-1124]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
CHESHIRE PARKER SCHNEIDER & BRYAN, PLLC; ALAN SCHNEIDER;
JOHN DOES 1-3,
Defendants - Appellees.
Plaintiff - Appellant,
CARMEN HOYME BANNON, in each of her official and individual capacities;
Defendants - Appellees,
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, an Agency of the State of North
Carolina; WAYNE TRUAX, in each of his official and individual capacities;
KATHERINE JEAN, in each of her official and individual capacities; JOHN
DOES 1-10; JOHN DOES 1-5,
Pg: 2 of 3
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01534-TSE-MSN; 1:16-cv01535-TSE-MSN)
Submitted: September 26, 2017
Decided: September 28, 2017
Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Polidi, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Richard Polidi appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983,
1985 (2012) complaints under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012) and denying his Motion
to Set Aside Order and for a New Hearing. * We have reviewed the records and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Polidi v. Cheshire Parker Schneider & Bryan, PLLC, No. 1:16-cv-01534-TSE-MSN
(E.D. Va. Dec. 22, 2016; Jan. 25, 2017); Polidi v. Bannon, No. 1:16-cv-01535-TSE-MSN
(E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 2016; filed Dec. 29, 2016 & entered Dec. 30, 2016). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The district court declined to exercise jurisdiction over Polidi’s state law claims,
dismissing them without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (2012).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?