Peter K. Stern v. US
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [1000096062-2]; denying Motion for other relief [1000066566-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00329-MR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Peter Stern. [17-1139]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
PETER K. STERN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00329-MR)
Submitted: June 27, 2017
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: July 14, 2017
Pg: 2 of 2
Peter Kay Stern appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of
error coram nobis and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stern v. United States, No. 1:16-cv00329-MR (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2016 & Jan. 12, 2017). We deny as moot Stern’s
motions for final judgment on the pleadings and to expedite the decision. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?