Peter K. Stern v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to expedite decision [1000096062-2]; denying Motion for other relief [1000066566-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00329-MR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000118289]. Mailed to: Peter Stern. [17-1139]

Appeal: 17-1139

Doc: 10

Filed: 07/14/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1139

PETER K. STERN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00329-MR)

Submitted: June 27, 2017

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter K. Stern, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: July 14, 2017

Appeal: 17-1139

Doc: 10

Filed: 07/14/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Peter Kay Stern appeals the district court’s orders denying his petition for a writ of
error coram nobis and denying his motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Stern v. United States, No. 1:16-cv00329-MR (W.D.N.C. Nov. 28, 2016 & Jan. 12, 2017). We deny as moot Stern’s
motions for final judgment on the pleadings and to expedite the decision. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2