Grace Makau v. Louise Meyer


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01346-TDS-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105093].. [17-1154]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1154 Doc: 19 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1154 GRACE MAKAU, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LOUISE MEYER, District Court Judge; KRIS BAILEY, District Court Judge; VINCE ROZIER, District Court Judge; ERIN GRABER, District Court Judge; CHRISTINE M. WALZYK, District Court Judge; BEVERLY SCARLETT, District Court Judge; JOE M. BUCKNER, District Court Judge; LUNSFORD LONG, District Court Judge; PAIGE VERNON, District Court Judge, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01346-TDS-JEP) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Japheth N. Matemu, MATEMU LAW OFFICE P.C., Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1154 Doc: 19 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Grace Makau appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil complaint as frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed Makau’s appellate brief and the record on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Makau v. Meyer, No. 1:16-cv-01346-TDS-JEP (M.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?