Thomas Earl Jones v. Wilbert Burial Vault Inc


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal [1000059217-2] Originating case number: 6:15-cv-03408-TMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000088186]. Mailed to: Thomas Earl Jones 215 Clemson Avenue Greenville, SC 29611. [17-1162]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1162 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1162 THOMAS EARL JONES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WILBERT BURIAL VAULT INC; BOYD C. ANDERSON; STEPHEN M. YOUNG, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (6:15-cv-03408-TMC) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Earl Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Vernon F. Dunbar, McANGUS, GOUDELOCK & COURIE, LLP, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1162 Doc: 16 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Earl Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action seeking recovery under a profit sharing retirement plan administered by his former employer, Wilbert Burial Vault, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Wilbert Burial Vault Inc., No. 6:15-cv-03408-TMC (D.S.C. Jan. 6, 2017). In light of this disposition, we deny the Defendants’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?