Katherine Harris v. Cabarrus County Board of Ed.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend complaint [1000083407-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00702-CCE-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000090030]. Mailed to: Katherine Harris. [17-1199]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1199 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/30/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1199 KATHERINE HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; UNION COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; CHARLOTTEMECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; STANLY COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; ALBEMARLE CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; NORTH CAROLINA RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES BOARD OF TRUSTEES; BARRY SHEPHERD, in his individual capacity; KATHRYN AUGER, in her individual capacity; GARY AUSTIN, in his individual capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00702-CCE-JEP) Submitted: May 25, 2017 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Decided: May 30, 2017 Appeal: 17-1199 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/30/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Katherine Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. King, III, Daniel F. E. Smith, BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Terry LaMonte Wallace, WALLACE CHILDERS PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina; Kirk London Bowling, BOWLING LAW FIRM, PLLC, Albemarle, North Carolina; Robert Michael Curran, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-1199 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/30/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Katherine Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of Educ., No. 1:16-cv-00702-CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2017). We deny Harris’ motion to amend her complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?