Katherine Harris v. Cabarrus County Board of Ed.
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to amend complaint [1000083407-2]. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-00702-CCE-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Katherine Harris. [17-1199]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
CABARRUS COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; UNION
COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; CHARLOTTEMECKLENBURG BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; STANLY
COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; ALBEMARLE CITY
SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, a body corporate; NORTH CAROLINA
RETIREMENT SYSTEM FOR TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES
BOARD OF TRUSTEES; BARRY SHEPHERD, in his individual capacity;
KATHRYN AUGER, in her individual capacity; GARY AUSTIN, in his individual
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:16-cv-00702-CCE-JEP)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: May 30, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Katherine Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. King, III, Daniel F. E. Smith, BROOKS,
PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, LLP, Greensboro, North
Carolina; Terry LaMonte Wallace, WALLACE CHILDERS PLLC, Charlotte, North
Carolina; Kirk London Bowling, BOWLING LAW FIRM, PLLC, Albemarle, North
Carolina; Robert Michael Curran, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Katherine Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint
as time-barred. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harris v. Cabarrus Cty. Bd. of
Educ., No. 1:16-cv-00702-CCE-JEP (M.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2017). We deny Harris’ motion
to amend her complaint. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?