Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, NC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:16-mc-00003-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000088011]. Mailed to: Daniel Willis. [17-1203]

Appeal: 17-1203

Doc: 9

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1203

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; DARLENE SPIVEY, as Mayor;
DAL WOOTEN, as former Town Council; SHERI M. DAVENPORT, as former
Town Council; CHRISTOPHER C. HENDERSON, as former Town Council;
CHARLES C. JONES, as Town Council Member; DANNY HORVATH, as Town
Council Member; GLENN SPIVEY, as Town Clerk; CLAIRE LYNN, and others,
associated with the Town of Trenton; ANN BROCK, and others, associated with
the Town of Trenton; CAROL HOOD, and others, associated with the Town of
Trenton; JUDGE M. J. HOWARD, United States District Court, Eastern Division,
North Carolina; CLERK PATRICIA S. CONNOR, Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit, and/or their successors,
Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:16-mc-00003-BO)

Submitted: May 23, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Decided: May 25, 2017

Appeal: 17-1203

Doc: 9

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-1203

Doc: 9

Filed: 05/25/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
leave to file a civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Willis v. Town of
Trenton, NC, No. 4:16-mc-00003-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3