Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, NC
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:16-mc-00003-BO. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Daniel Willis. [17-1203]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA; DARLENE SPIVEY, as Mayor;
DAL WOOTEN, as former Town Council; SHERI M. DAVENPORT, as former
Town Council; CHRISTOPHER C. HENDERSON, as former Town Council;
CHARLES C. JONES, as Town Council Member; DANNY HORVATH, as Town
Council Member; GLENN SPIVEY, as Town Clerk; CLAIRE LYNN, and others,
associated with the Town of Trenton; ANN BROCK, and others, associated with
the Town of Trenton; CAROL HOOD, and others, associated with the Town of
Trenton; JUDGE M. J. HOWARD, United States District Court, Eastern Division,
North Carolina; CLERK PATRICIA S. CONNOR, Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit, and/or their successors,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Greenville. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (4:16-mc-00003-BO)
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: May 25, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
leave to file a civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Willis v. Town of
Trenton, NC, No. 4:16-mc-00003-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?