In Re: Catherine Randolph

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000054721-2] in 17-1211 Originating case number: 1:15-mc-00369 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087986].. [17-1211, 17-1381]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1211 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1211 In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Appellant. No. 17-1381 In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH, Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Decided: May 25, 2017 Appeal: 17-1211 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Catherine Denise Randolph, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-1211 Doc: 13 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s orders returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the prefiling injunction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?