In Re: Catherine Randolph
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000054721-2] in 17-1211 Originating case number: 1:15-mc-00369 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087986].. [17-1211, 17-1381]
Appeal: 17-1211
Doc: 13
Filed: 05/25/2017
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1211
In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Appellant.
No. 17-1381
In re: CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, Chief District Judge. (1:15-mc-00369)
Submitted: May 23, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: May 25, 2017
Appeal: 17-1211
Doc: 13
Filed: 05/25/2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Catherine Denise Randolph, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 17-1211
Doc: 13
Filed: 05/25/2017
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district
court’s orders returning her complaints because they were not in compliance with the
prefiling injunction.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeals. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?