In re: Alan Mackety


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000025392-2] as moot; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000025399-2]. Originating case number: 5:16-hc-02120-D. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000060434]. Mailed to: Petitioner. [17-1214]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1214 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/12/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1214 In Re: ALAN ANDREW MACKETY, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:16-hc-02120-D) Submitted: April 5, 2017 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alan Andrew Mackety, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: April 12, 2017 Appeal: 17-1214 Doc: 7 Filed: 04/12/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Alan Andrew Mackety petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has dismissed the § 2241 petition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Mackety’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?