In re: Raymond Edward Chestnut
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000026867-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000044385-2] Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1,4:16-cv-02013-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Raymond Edward Chestnut. [17-1223]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: June 23, 2017
Pg: 2 of 2
Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel
the district court to act on his Motion to Vacate Stay Order. Our review of the district
court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, we deny
the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?