In re: Raymond Edward Chestnut


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000026867-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000044385-2] Originating case number: 4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1,4:16-cv-02013-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105996]. Mailed to: Raymond Edward Chestnut. [17-1223]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1223 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/23/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1223 In Re: RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1; 4:16-cv-02013-RBH) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Raymond Edward Chestnut, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 23, 2017 Appeal: 17-1223 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/23/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Edward Chestnut petitions for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the district court to act on his Motion to Vacate Stay Order. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has denied the motion. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?