Patricia Prescott v. PHH Mortgage Corporation


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to dismiss appeal [1000085745-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000041081-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00288-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000087945]. Mailed to: P Prescott. [17-1235]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1235 Doc: 23 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1235 PATRICIA A. PRESCOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION; PROFESSIONAL FORECLOSURE CORPORATION OF VIRGINIA; SHAPIRO, BROWN & ALT, LLP, f/k/a Shapiro & Burson; LOGS CORPORATION; GERALD SHAPIRO, Principal; JOHN BURSON, Principal; GERALD ALT, Principal; KRISTINE BROWN, Principal; SPROUSES CORNER, L.L.C.; J. CABELL METTS, III; R. ALAN ANDERSON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (3:16-cv-00288-REP) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia A. Prescott, Appellant Pro Se. J.P. McGuire Boyd, Jr., WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia; John MacDonald Robb, III, LECLAIR RYAN, PC, Richmond, Virginia; Lisa Hudson Kim, SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Appeal: 17-1235 Doc: 23 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-1235 Doc: 23 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Patricia A. Prescott appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Prescott v. PHH Mortgage Corp., No. 3:16-cv-00288-REP (E.D. Va., Feb. 2, 2017). In light of our decision to affirm the judgment of the district court, we deny Appellee PHH Mortgage Corporation’s motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?