Harley David Crosby v. S.C. Dept. of Public Safety
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-01455-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Harley David Crosby. [17-1236]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
HARLEY DAVID CROSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; SOUTH
CAROLINA HIGHWAY PATROL; JAMES C. FILYAW,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cv-01455-RMG)
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: June 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harley David Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn,
SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Harley David Crosby appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) claim and remanding the remaining claims to the state court. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Crosby v. South Carolina Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 2:15-cv-01455-RMG
(D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?