Harley David Crosby v. S.C. Dept. of Public Safety

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:15-cv-01455-RMG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105178]. Mailed to: Harley David Crosby. [17-1236]

Appeal: 17-1236

Doc: 11

Filed: 06/22/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1236

HARLEY DAVID CROSBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; SOUTH
CAROLINA HIGHWAY PATROL; JAMES C. FILYAW,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cv-01455-RMG)

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Decided: June 22, 2017

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harley David Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, Sandra J. Senn,
SENN LEGAL, LLC, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1236

Doc: 11

Filed: 06/22/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Harley David Crosby appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) claim and remanding the remaining claims to the state court. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Crosby v. South Carolina Dep’t of Pub. Safety, 2:15-cv-01455-RMG
(D.S.C. Jan. 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2