Louise Biggers v. Wells Fargo Bank NA
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00431-JAG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: L Biggers. [17-1275]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
WELLS FARGO BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; GOVERNMENT
NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Securitized Trust
Ginnie Mae Remic Trust 2011-002; GINNIE MAE; WELLS FARGO HOME
MORTGAGE; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC,
a/k/a MERS; DOES 1 THROUGH 100, inclusive,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:16-cv-00431-JAG)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Decided: May 30, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louise Biggers, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES,
PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Louise Biggers appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint seeking
to forestall the foreclosure of her home for failure to state a claim and as barred by res
judicata. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Biggers’ informal brief does not challenge the district
court’s dispositive conclusion that her claims are barred by res judicata, Biggers has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d
423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?