Mary Lyons Felton v. Gates County Brd of Education


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to file surreply brief [1000074661-2] Originating case number: 2:15-cv-00020-BR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105117].. [17-1287]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1287 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1287 MARY E. LYONS FELTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GATES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-00020-BR) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary E. Lyons Felton, Appellant Pro Se. John D. Leidy, HORNTHAL, RILEY, ELLIS & MALAND, LLP, Elizabeth City, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1287 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Mary E. Lyons Felton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Gates County Board of Education on Felton’s retaliation claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2012). We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. We thus affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Felton v. Gates Cty. Bd. of Educ., No. 2:15-cv-00020-BR (E.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 2017). We deny as moot the Gates County Board of Education’s motion to file a surreply brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?