In re: Vivek Shah


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000037364-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000080126-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000045410-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000080122-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cr-00172-1,5:13-cr-00127-1,5:15-cv-07542 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105074]. Mailed to: Vivek Shah. [17-1294]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1294 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1294 In re: VIVEK SHAH, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Nos. 5:12-cr-00172-1; 5:13-cr-00127-1; 5:15-cv-07542) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vivek Shah, petitioner pro se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 22, 2017 Appeal: 17-1294 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Vivek Shah petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Shah’s petition and supplemental petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?