Barbara Curry v. Thomas Built Bus Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:15-cv-00992-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000127827]. Mailed to: Barbara Curry. [17-1296]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1296 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/31/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1296 BARBARA LINDSEY CURRY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THOMAS BUILT BUS INC., Defendant - Appellee, and ADAM STEIFER; MATTHEW FLATLOW; VANESSA, PARALEGAL; EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION; DR. MICHAUX KILAPATRICK; NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY ADJUDICATION UNIT, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00992-CCE-LPA) Submitted: July 27, 2017 Decided: July 31, 2017 Before AGEE and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Appeal: 17-1296 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/31/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Barbara Lindsey Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Allen Bright, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina; Brodie Davis Erwin, Kevin Scott Joyner, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-1296 Doc: 11 Filed: 07/31/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Barbara Lindsey Curry appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * Curry v. Thomas Built Bus Inc., No. 1:15-cv-00992-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * To the extent that Curry seeks to raise new claims on appeal related to her resignation settlement or workers compensation, she fails to demonstrate that exceptional circumstances warrant consideration of those claims. See Pornomo v. United States, 814 F.3d 681, 686 (4th Cir. 2016) (“Absent exceptional circumstances we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.” (ellipsis omitted)). 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?