Rona Ansah v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000064236-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000123743]. Mailed to: R Ansah. [17-1300]
Appeal: 17-1300
Doc: 14
Filed: 07/24/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1300
RONA ROSEMOND ANSAH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WALMART STORES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rona Rosemond Ansah, Appellant Pro Se. John Mark Murdock, BENTON POTTER
MURDOCK, PC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1300
Doc: 14
Filed: 07/24/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Rona Rosemond Ansah appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil
action for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ansah leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Ansah v. WalMart
Stores, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2017). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?