Rona Ansah v. Walmart Stores, Inc.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000064236-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000123743]. Mailed to: R Ansah. [17-1300]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1300 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/24/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1300 RONA ROSEMOND ANSAH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WALMART STORES, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD) Submitted: July 20, 2017 Decided: July 24, 2017 Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rona Rosemond Ansah, Appellant Pro Se. John Mark Murdock, BENTON POTTER MURDOCK, PC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1300 Doc: 14 Filed: 07/24/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Rona Rosemond Ansah appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Ansah leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. Ansah v. WalMart Stores, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-01351-JCC-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?