Robert Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000105130]. Mailed to: Robert Lauter. [17-1304]
Appeal: 17-1304
Doc: 8
Filed: 06/22/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1304
ROBERT LAUTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GLAXOSMITHKLINE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK)
Submitted: June 20, 2017
Decided: June 22, 2017
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Lauter, Appellant Pro Se.
Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Richard J. Cromwell, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP,
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1304
Doc: 8
Filed: 06/22/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Lauter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack
of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Lauter v.
GlaxoSmithKline, No. 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?