Robert Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000105130]. Mailed to: Robert Lauter. [17-1304]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1304 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1304 ROBERT LAUTER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lauter, Appellant Pro Se. Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Richard J. Cromwell, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1304 Doc: 8 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Robert Lauter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lauter v. GlaxoSmithKline, No. 2:16-cv-00716-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?