In re: Antoine Hill


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000042589-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000042585-2] Originating case number: 3:07-cr-00407-REP-DJN-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105210]. Mailed to: Antoine Hill FCI MORGANTOWN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1000 Morgantown, WV 26507-1000. [17-1331]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1331 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1331 In re: ANTOINE HILL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:07-cr-00407-REP-DJN-1) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antoine Hill, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 22, 2017 Appeal: 17-1331 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Antoine Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court’s docket establishes that Hill’s action is proceeding and reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant Hill’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?