In re: Jermaine Jerrell Sim


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000048592-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000043601-2] Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00045-CMH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105221]. Mailed to: Jermaine Jerrell Sims FCI BUTNER MEDIUM II FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P. O. Box 1500 Butner, NC 27509-0000 Kenneth E. Melson. [17-1338]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1338 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1338 In re: JERMAINE JERRELL SIMS, a/k/a Justice, a/k/a Jus, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:98-cr-00045-CMH-1) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jermaine Jerrell Sims, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 22, 2017 Appeal: 17-1338 Doc: 20 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Jermaine Jerrell Sims petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to transfer United States v. Sims, No. 3:98-cr-00045, from the Alexandria Division to the Richmond Division of the Eastern District of Virginia for any further proceedings. We conclude that Sims is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509, 516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Because Sims has shown neither extraordinary circumstances nor his clear right to the transfer, he is not entitled mandamus relief. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?