International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump

Filing 276

COURT ORDER filed [1000070135] approving/authorizing C-Span request for live audio feed of oral argument. Copies to all parties.. [17-1351] (JSN)

Download PDF
FILED: April 26, 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ___________________ No. 17-1351 (8:17-cv-00361-TDC) ___________________ INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself; HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients; MIDDLE EAST STUDIES ASSOCIATION OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., on behalf of itself and its members; MUHAMMED METEAB; PAUL HARRISON; IBRAHIM AHMED MOHOMED; JOHN DOES #1 & 3; JANE DOE #2 Plaintiffs - Appellees v. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States; DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE; JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as Secretary of Homeland Security; REX W. TILLERSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of State; DANIEL R. COATS, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence Defendants - Appellants ___________________ ORDER ___________________ C-Span has requested a real-time audio feed of the oral argument in this case to permit the argument to be aired live in light of heightened public interest. The Court grants the request. C-Span will serve as the pool-feed for real- time audio of the oral argument, which is scheduled for May 8, 2017, at 2:30 p.m. Other media organizations may apply for access to the feed by submitting a Media Request on the Court’s Web site Contact page ( by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, May 5, 2017. Links to the live audio feed and to the completed audio file will be posted on the Court’s Web site. For the Court /s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?