Ronald Satish Emrit v. Joe Heck


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:17-cv-00074-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000109996]. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit. [17-1364]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1364 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/30/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1364 RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONGRESSMAN JOE HECK, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00074-PWG) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: June 30, 2017 Appeal: 17-1364 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/30/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for improper venue. On appeal, we limit our review to the issues raised in Emrit’s informal brief. Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). We have reviewed the record in light of these arguments and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Heck, No. 8:17-cv-00074-PWG (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?