Ronald Satish Emrit v. Joe Heck

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:17-cv-00074-PWG Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000109996]. Mailed to: Ronald Satish Emrit. [17-1364]

Appeal: 17-1364

Doc: 7

Filed: 06/30/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1364

RONALD SATISH EMRIT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONGRESSMAN JOE HECK,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:17-cv-00074-PWG)

Submitted: June 20, 2017

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald Satish Emrit, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: June 30, 2017

Appeal: 17-1364

Doc: 7

Filed: 06/30/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil
complaint for improper venue. On appeal, we limit our review to the issues raised in
Emrit’s informal brief. Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014). We have
reviewed the record in light of these arguments and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v.
Heck, No. 8:17-cv-00074-PWG (D. Md. Jan. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2