Corry Searles v. Liberty Ins. Corp.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:17-cv-00143-MSD-RJK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency [1000087885]. Mailed to: Corry D. Searles. [17-1400]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1400 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1400 CORRY D. SEARLES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIBERTY INS. CORP.; GREG EVANS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District Judge. (2:17-cv-00143-MSD-RJK) Submitted: May 23, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corry D. Searles, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Decided: May 25, 2017 Appeal: 17-1400 Doc: 7 Filed: 05/25/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Corry D. Searles appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action as barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Searles’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Searles has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?