De' Andre Starnes v. Gilbarco Veeder-Root

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for leave to file [1000085571-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000061304-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01002-WO-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000131333]. Mailed to: D Starnes. [17-1411]

Appeal: 17-1411

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/04/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1411

DE’ ANDRE STARNES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GILBARCO VEEDER-ROOT,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-01002-WO-LPA)

Submitted: July 24, 2017

Decided: August 4, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

De’ Andre Starnes, Appellant Pro Se. James Marion Powell, WOMBLE CARLYLE
SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1411

Doc: 14

Filed: 08/04/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
De’ Andre Starnes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
his former employer.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we grant Starnes’ motion for leave to file an amended informal brief, deny
the motion to appoint counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Starnes v. Veeder-Root, No. 1:15-cv-01002-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

2