De' Andre Starnes v. Gilbarco Veeder-Root
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion for leave to file [1000085571-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000061304-2] Originating case number: 1:15-cv-01002-WO-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: D Starnes. [17-1411]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
DE’ ANDRE STARNES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:15-cv-01002-WO-LPA)
Submitted: July 24, 2017
Decided: August 4, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
De’ Andre Starnes, Appellant Pro Se. James Marion Powell, WOMBLE CARLYLE
SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
De’ Andre Starnes appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
his former employer.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant Starnes’ motion for leave to file an amended informal brief, deny
the motion to appoint counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Starnes v. Veeder-Root, No. 1:15-cv-01002-WO-LPA (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?