In re: George Crane, V
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000057223-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000063800-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00297-LO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Petitioner. [17-1435]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In re: GEORGE WASHINGTON CRANE, V,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:13-cr-00297-LO-1)
Submitted: May 25, 2017
Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Washington Crane, V, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: May 31, 2017
Pg: 2 of 2
George Washington Crane, V petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion.
He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the
district court’s docket reveals that the district court denied Crane’s motion on May 1,
2017. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Crane’s case, we deny
the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?