William Scott Davis, Jr. v. W. Earl Britt
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [1000064780-2] Originating case number: 5:16-ct-03211-BA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: William Scott Davis Jr. PIEDMONT REGIONAL JAIL P. O. Box 388 Farmville, VA 23901-0000. [17-1439]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
W. EARL BRITT; JAMES C. FOX; JAMES C. DEVER, III; LOUISE W.
FLANAGAN; TERRENCE BOYLE; MALCOLM J. HOWARD; JAMES C.
GATES; REBECCA BEACH SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:16-ct-03211-BA)
Submitted: June 22, 2017
Decided: June 26, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his
postjudgment motions in a closed civil case. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Davis v. Britt, No. 5:16-ct-03211-BA (E.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2017). We deny Davis’ motion
to remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?