Reina Ramos De Chacon v. Jefferson Sessions III
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A206-888-944,A206-888-945,A206-888-946 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [17-1441]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
REINA MARISOL RAMOS DE CHACON; V.K.C.R.; A.J.C.R.,
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: October 27, 2017
Decided: November 3, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Abdoul Konare, KONARE LAW, Frederick, Maryland, for Petitioners. Chad A. Readler,
Acting Assistant Attorney General, Anthony W. Norwood, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Reina Marisol Ramos De Chacon and her two daughters, natives and citizens of El
Salvador, petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of De Chacon’s application
for asylum. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of De
Chacon’s merits hearing before the immigration court and all supporting evidence. We
conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the
administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial
evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481
(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?