Richard Foy v. US

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000059016-2] Originating case number: 5:17-cv-00080-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000089090]. Mailed to: Richard Foy. [17-1447]

Appeal: 17-1447

Doc: 9

Filed: 05/26/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1447

RICHARD C. FOY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, Past
President of the United States of America; US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; US
FEDERAL COMMUNICATION COMMISSION,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:17-cv-00080-F)

Submitted: May 23, 3017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard C. Foy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Decided: May 26, 2017

Appeal: 17-1447

Doc: 9

Filed: 05/26/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Richard C. Foy seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation
that Foy’s complaint be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). This
court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and
certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order
Foy seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral
order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2