Lisha Austin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00086-RJK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000105125].. [17-1460]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1460 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1460 LISHA AUSTIN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert John Krask, Magistrate Judge. (2:16-cv-00086-RJK) Submitted: June 20, 2017 Decided: June 22, 2017 Before SHEDD, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lisha Austin, Appellant Pro Se. Christy Lee Murphy, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1460 Doc: 16 Filed: 06/22/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lisha Austin appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Austin’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Austin has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?