Ronald Hayward v. Eric Brown
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000078549-2] Originating case number: 8:15-cv-03381-PWG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: R. Hayward. [17-1465]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
ERIC C. BROWN, Executive Director; SHARON LAND, Deputy Director;
YVONNE ALEXANDER, Deputy Director; JOSEPHINE B. CLAY, Hearing
Officer; JOYCE RICHARDSON, Program Manager; WILLIAM VALENTINE,
Rental Specialist Supervisor; PAMELA JONES, Compliance Specialist,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Paul W. Grimm, District Judge. (8:15-cv-03381-PWG)
Submitted: August 17, 2017
Decided: August 21, 2017
Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Hayward, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Blackburn Riley, BLACKBURN RILEY
LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Ronald Hayward appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(2012) complaint after the parties reached a settlement agreement in which Hayward
agreed to release his claims against the defendants. On appeal, Hayward does not dispute
the existence of the agreement or that its terms are clear and constitute the entire
agreement among the parties. Because Hayward proffers no viable challenge to the
enforceability of the agreement, we affirm the judgment of the district court. * We further
deny the motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
On the same day he noted his appeal, Hayward filed a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 motion,
which the district court subsequently denied. Because Hayward did not note a separate
appeal of the order denying his Rule 59 motion, that order is not before this court. Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?