In re: Douglas Fauconier
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000061417-2] Originating case number: 1:14-cv-01692-TSE-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [17-1473]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In Re: DOUGLAS LEIGH FAUCONIER,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted: August 2, 2017
Decided: September 1, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Douglas Leigh Fauconier, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Douglas Leigh Fauconier petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district
court has unduly delayed acting on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court
directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the
district court has recently granted Fauconier’s application to proceed in forma pauperis
and ordered the Defendants to file a response to his complaint. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently acted in Fauconier’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as
moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?