Louie Smith, Jr. v. The Print Machine, Inc.


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-02918-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000140519]. Mailed to: Louie Smith. [17-1496]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1496 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/21/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1496 LOUIE LAWTON SMITH, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE PRINT MACHINE, INC., a South Carolina Corporation; KASEY COOPER FAY, President of T.P.M., Inc.; JIM NORRIS, Human Resource Manager of T.P.M.; CHRIS FAY, Vice President of T.P.M.; JERRY COOPER, Chairman of T.P.M.; MATT LUTHER, T.P.M. Manager of Columbia, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-02918-JFA) Submitted: August 17, 2017 Decided: August 21, 2017 Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louie Lawton Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Kinard Johnson, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1496 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/21/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Louie Lawton Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil action alleging wrongful termination and employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. The Print Machine, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-02918-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?