Louie Smith, Jr. v. The Print Machine, Inc.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:16-cv-02918-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000140519]. Mailed to: Louie Smith. [17-1496]
Appeal: 17-1496
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/21/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1496
LOUIE LAWTON SMITH, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE PRINT MACHINE, INC., a South Carolina Corporation; KASEY COOPER
FAY, President of T.P.M., Inc.; JIM NORRIS, Human Resource Manager of
T.P.M.; CHRIS FAY, Vice President of T.P.M.; JERRY COOPER, Chairman of
T.P.M.; MATT LUTHER, T.P.M. Manager of Columbia,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-02918-JFA)
Submitted: August 17, 2017
Decided: August 21, 2017
Before KEENAN, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louie Lawton Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Kinard Johnson, OGLETREE
DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1496
Doc: 10
Filed: 08/21/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Louie Lawton Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil action alleging wrongful termination
and employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. The
Print Machine, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-02918-JFA (D.S.C. Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?