Raykisha Morrison v. Resource Management Concept


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000083981-2]; denying Motion to supplement [1000083984-2]; denying Motion to seal [1000083987-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00651-GCM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000155588]. Mailed to: Raykisha Morrison. [17-1505]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1505 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/14/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1505 RAYKISHA MORRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS, Defendant - Appellee. -----------------------------EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Amicus Supporting Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00651-GCM) Submitted: August 31, 2017 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Decided: September 14, 2017 Appeal: 17-1505 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/14/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Raykisha Morrison, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Lee, Deputy General Counsel, Jennifer S. Goldstein, Associate General Counsel, Elizabeth E. Theran, Acting Assistant General Counsel, Paul D. Ramshaw, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Amicus supporting Appellant. Gregory Wenzl Brown, Kristi Lyn Gavalier, Eric Richard Martinson, BROWN LAW LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-1505 Doc: 16 Filed: 09/14/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Raykisha Morrison appeals the district court’s order dismissing her employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morrison v. Resource Mgmt. Concepts, No. 3:16-cv-00651-GCM (W.D.N.C. Mar. 21, 2017). We deny Morrison’s motions to appoint counsel, to supplement the record, and to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?