William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000085035-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000166471]. Mailed to: William Taccino. [17-1507]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1507 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/03/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1507 WILLIAM A. TACCINO, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PATRICK MORRISEY; SUE ROBEY; J. COURRIER; JOE E. MILLER; JAMES DAVIS; TROOPER JOHN DROPPLEMAN; NELSON MICHAEL; MICHAEL SHAY; KEITH BRADSHAW; BRIDGET COHEE; TRACEY B. EBERLING; JASON P. FOSTER; RALPH BRADY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT) Submitted: September 19, 2017 Decided: October 3, 2017 Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1507 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/03/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Morrisey¸ No. 3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?