William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000085035-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000166471]. Mailed to: William Taccino. [17-1507]
Appeal: 17-1507
Doc: 9
Filed: 10/03/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1507
WILLIAM A. TACCINO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PATRICK MORRISEY; SUE ROBEY; J. COURRIER; JOE E. MILLER;
JAMES DAVIS; TROOPER JOHN DROPPLEMAN; NELSON MICHAEL;
MICHAEL SHAY; KEITH BRADSHAW; BRIDGET COHEE; TRACEY B.
EBERLING; JASON P. FOSTER; RALPH BRADY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia,
at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT)
Submitted: September 19, 2017
Decided: October 3, 2017
Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William A. Taccino, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1507
Doc: 9
Filed: 10/03/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Taccino v. Morrisey¸ No. 3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va.
Mar. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?