Thomas Singleton v. Dr. Erman
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Thomas Singleton. [17-1512]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS GARCIA SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
DR. EMRAN, Medical Doctor/Correct Care Solutions,
Defendant - Appellee,
C. T. WOODY, Sheriff of Richmond, VA; CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: October 23, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Thomas Garcia Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Griggs, Katherine Curie Skilling,
WIMBISH GENTILE MCCRAY & ROEBER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Thomas Garcia Singleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to
comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singleton v. Emran,
No. 3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2017).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?