Thomas Singleton v. Dr. Erman

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000178475]. Mailed to: Thomas Singleton. [17-1512]

Appeal: 17-1512

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/23/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1512

THOMAS GARCIA SINGLETON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. EMRAN, Medical Doctor/Correct Care Solutions,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
C. T. WOODY, Sheriff of Richmond, VA; CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS,
Medical Company,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Decided: October 23, 2017

Appeal: 17-1512

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/23/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Thomas Garcia Singleton, Appellant Pro Se. Ruth Griggs, Katherine Curie Skilling,
WIMBISH GENTILE MCCRAY & ROEBER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-1512

Doc: 14

Filed: 10/23/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Thomas Garcia Singleton appeals the district court’s order dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to
comply with a court order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Singleton v. Emran,
No. 3:15-cv-00200-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2017).

We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3