Kobi J. Mullins v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to add party [1000101393-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000101275-2] Originating case number: 3:16-cv-00841-REP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000123495]. Mailed to: Mullins, White. [17-1536]

Appeal: 17-1536

Doc: 17

Filed: 07/24/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1536

KOBI J. MULLINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C.; SHUTTLEWORTH,
RULOFF, SWAIN, HADDAD & MORECOCK, PC,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:16-cv-00841-REP)

Submitted: July 20, 2017

Decided: July 24, 2017

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kobi J. Mullins, Appellant Pro Se. Terry Catherine Frank, KAUFMAN & CANOLES,
PC, Richmond, Virginia; Michele Adams Mulligan, GOLIGHTLY MULLIGAN PLC,
Richmond, Virginia; Samuel I. White, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1536

Doc: 17

Filed: 07/24/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Kobi J. Mullins appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for
failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court.

Mullins v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., No.

3:16-cv-00841-REP (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2017). We also deny Mullins’ motion to add a
party. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

DISMISSED

2