Fredicia Hardnett v. M&T Bank
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:15-cv-00622-MHL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Hardnett, Hardnett. [17-1538]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
FREDICIA HARDNETT; WILBERT A. HARDNETT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
M & T BANK; ATLANTIC LAW GROUP; JOHN DOE 1-10; JANE DOE 1-10,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:15-cv-00622-MHL)
Submitted: October 19, 2017
Decided: October 23, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fredicia Hardnett, Wilbert A. Hardnett, Appellants Pro Se. Robert Miltz Luck, III, REED
SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Fredicia Hardnett and Wilbert A. Hardnett appeal the district court’s order
dismissing their suit and denying their motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Hardnett v. M&T Bank, No. 3:15-cv-00622-MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 31 &
Sept. 19, 2016; Apr. 13, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?