In re: Travis Arnold
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000069908-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000079254-2]; denying Motion to suspend [1000102635-2]; terminating Motion for orders of protection and for unlimited and unrestricted access to communicate to law enforcement members [1000161099-2] Originating case numbers: 1:08-cr-00322-TDS-1,1:16-cv-00725-TDS-JEP. Copies to all parties and the district court. . Mailed to: Petitioner. [17-1543]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
In re: TRAVIS DENORRIS ARNOLD,
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(Nos. 1:08-cr-00322-TDS-1; 1:16-cv-00725-TDS-JEP)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Denorris Arnold, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: October 2, 2017
Pg: 2 of 2
Travis Denorris Arnold petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district
court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s
docket reveals that the district court dismissed the motion on June 23, 2017.
Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Arnold’s case, we deny the
mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
Arnold’s motion to suspend appellate proceedings. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?