John Stritzinger v. Upland Police Department
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000091650-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-04796-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000123683].. [17-1544]
Appeal: 17-1544
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/24/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1544
JOHN S. STRITZINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; NORWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT;
ENTERPRISE RENTAL CAR; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA;
DOLLAR RENT A CAR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-04796-TLW)
Submitted: July 20, 2017
Decided: July 24, 2017
Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 17-1544
Doc: 13
Filed: 07/24/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with a court
order. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Stritzinger’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Stritzinger has forfeited appellate review of the court’s
order.
See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).
Accordingly, although we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?