John Stritzinger v. Upland Police Department

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000091650-2] Originating case number: 3:15-cv-04796-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000123683].. [17-1544]

Appeal: 17-1544

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/24/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1544

JOHN S. STRITZINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UPLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT; NORWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT;
ENTERPRISE RENTAL CAR; COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA;
DOLLAR RENT A CAR,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-04796-TLW)

Submitted: July 20, 2017

Decided: July 24, 2017

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1544

Doc: 13

Filed: 07/24/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate
judge’s recommendation and dismissing his complaint for failing to comply with a court
order. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See
4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Stritzinger’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for
the district court’s disposition, Stritzinger has forfeited appellate review of the court’s
order.

See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004).

Accordingly, although we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm
the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2