Elaine Kassin v. The Select Group, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000090873-2] Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01263-GBL-TCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000123726]. Mailed to: E Kassin. [17-1575]

Appeal: 17-1575

Doc: 15

Filed: 07/24/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1575

ELAINE I. KASSIN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE SELECT GROUP, LLC; KIMBERLY BARBER; CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:16-cv-01263-GBL-TCB)

Submitted: July 20, 2017

Decided: July 24, 2017

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elaine I. Kassin, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Tevis Marshall, James Clay Rollins,
OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1575

Doc: 15

Filed: 07/24/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Elaine I. Kassin seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing her civil
complaint for failure to state a claim and denying her motion for reconsideration. On
appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir.
R. 34(b). Because Kassin’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district
court’s disposition, Kassin has forfeited appellate review of the court’s orders. See
Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we
deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2