Kriesta L. Watson v. Shenandoah University
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000101249-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Catherine Jackson Huff. [17-1588]
Pg: 1 of 3
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
KRIESTA L. WATSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY; BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
Defendants - Appellees,
BRYON GRIGSBY; MARIE LANDES; CALVIN ALLEN; KAREN ABRAHAM;
STEVEN HUMPRIES; TRACEY FITZSIMMONS,
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH)
Submitted: September 27, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Decided: October 26, 2017
Pg: 2 of 3
Kriesta L. Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Jackson Huff, Paul Granger
Klockenbrink, Monica Taylor Monday, GENTRY LOCKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 3 of 3
Kriesta L. Watson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in her
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Watson’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Watson v. Shenandoah Univ., No. 5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar.
29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?