Kriesta L. Watson v. Shenandoah University

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [1000101249-2] Originating case number: 5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000180884]. Mailed to: Catherine Jackson Huff. [17-1588]

Appeal: 17-1588

Doc: 24

Filed: 10/26/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1588

KRIESTA L. WATSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHENANDOAH UNIVERSITY; BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
BRYON GRIGSBY; MARIE LANDES; CALVIN ALLEN; KAREN ABRAHAM;
STEVEN HUMPRIES; TRACEY FITZSIMMONS,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Harrisonburg. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH)

Submitted: September 27, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Decided: October 26, 2017

Appeal: 17-1588

Doc: 24

Filed: 10/26/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Kriesta L. Watson, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine Jackson Huff, Paul Granger
Klockenbrink, Monica Taylor Monday, GENTRY LOCKE, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-1588

Doc: 24

Filed: 10/26/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Kriesta L. Watson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in her
civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Watson’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Watson v. Shenandoah Univ., No. 5:14-cv-00022-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va. Mar.
29, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3