M. Modderno v. Surety Trustees, LLC


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00077-JCC-TCB. Copies to all parties and the district court. [1000176506]. Mailed to: M. Francine Modderno. [17-1590]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1590 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/19/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1590 M. FRANCINE MODDERNO; THE ESTATE OF CLAUDE V. BACHE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SURETY TRUSTEES, LLC; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00077-JCC-TCB) Submitted: October 17, 2017 Decided: October 19, 2017 Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. M. Francine Modderno, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Daniel Cohen, MCCABE WEISBERG & CONWAY, LLC, Laurel, Maryland; Allison Melton, TROUTMAN SANDERS, LLP, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1590 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/19/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: M. Francine Modderno on behalf of herself and the Estate of Claude V. Bache appeals the district court’s order denying relief on the complaint seeking damages and equitable relief in connection with a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of real property located in Loudoun County, Virginia. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Modderno v. Surety Trustees, LLC., No. 1:17-cv-00077-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?