In re: Antonio Mosley
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000079292-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [1000079285-2] Originating case number: 3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1,3:14-cv-00399-RJC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000139846]. Mailed to: Antonio Mosley. [17-1614]
Appeal: 17-1614
Doc: 5
Filed: 08/18/2017
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-1614
In Re: ANTONIO MOSLEY, a/k/a Abdullah Hamid,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:11-cr-00336-RJC-1; 3:14-cv-00399-RJC)
Submitted: August 10, 2017
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antonio Mosley, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Decided: August 18, 2017
Appeal: 17-1614
Doc: 5
Filed: 08/18/2017
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Antonio Mosley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has
unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this
court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
that the district court denied Mosley’s motion on July 13, 2017. Accordingly, because the
district court has recently decided Mosley’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?