Thomas W. Lovegrove v. Brock & Scott, PLLC
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. .. [17-1615]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS W. LOVEGROVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL)
Submitted: September 28, 2017
Decided: October 11, 2017
Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Terry C. Frank, Benjamin A. Wills,
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Thomas W. Lovegrove appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing his
complaint asserting claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 1692a(e) (2012), and fraud; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration, Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e) and for leave to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record
included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lovegrove v. Brock &
Scott, PLLC, No. 2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2017; Apr. 6, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?