Thomas W. Lovegrove v. Brock & Scott, PLLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000170944].. [17-1615]

Appeal: 17-1615

Doc: 32

Filed: 10/11/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1615

THOMAS W. LOVEGROVE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL)

Submitted: September 28, 2017

Decided: October 11, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary M. Bowman, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellant. Terry C. Frank, Benjamin A. Wills,
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C., Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1615

Doc: 32

Filed: 10/11/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Thomas W. Lovegrove appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing his
complaint asserting claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C.
§ 1692a(e) (2012), and fraud; and (2) denying his motions for reconsideration, Fed. R.
Civ. P. 59(e) and for leave to file an amended complaint. We have reviewed the record
included on appeal, as well as the parties’ briefs, and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lovegrove v. Brock &
Scott, PLLC, No. 2:16-cv-00418-HCM-LRL (E.D. Va. Jan. 17, 2017; Apr. 6, 2017). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED

2