Pearson Dermetric v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000164285]. Mailed to: Dermetric Pearson. [17-1628]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1628 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/29/2017 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1628 DERMETRIC PEARSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CROPP-METCALFE, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN) Submitted: September 26, 2017 Decided: September 29, 2017 Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dermetric Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Lori Hunt Turner, ISLER DARE, PC, Vienna, Virginia; Frank Leo Kollman, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 17-1628 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/29/2017 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dermetric Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pearson v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2017; entered May 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?