Pearson Dermetric v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000164285]. Mailed to: Dermetric Pearson. [17-1628]

Appeal: 17-1628

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/29/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1628

DERMETRIC PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CROPP-METCALFE, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN)

Submitted: September 26, 2017

Decided: September 29, 2017

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dermetric Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Lori Hunt Turner, ISLER
DARE, PC, Vienna, Virginia; Frank Leo Kollman, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA,
Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1628

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/29/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Dermetric Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s
motion to dismiss his amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Pearson v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed May 5,
2017; entered May 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2