Pearson Dermetric v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: Dermetric Pearson. [17-1628]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Plaintiff - Appellant,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN)
Submitted: September 26, 2017
Decided: September 29, 2017
Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dermetric Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Lori Hunt Turner, ISLER
DARE, PC, Vienna, Virginia; Frank Leo Kollman, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA,
Timonium, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
Dermetric Pearson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s
motion to dismiss his amended civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Pearson v. Cropp-Metcalfe, Inc., No. 1:16-cv-01615-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. filed May 5,
2017; entered May 9, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?