Starsha Sewell v. WMATA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for initial hearing en banc (FRAP 35) [1000094086-2] Originating case number: 8:16-cv-02456-GJH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000157698]. Mailed to: S Sewell. [17-1632]

Appeal: 17-1632

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/19/2017

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1632

STARSHA M. SEWELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
George J. Hazel, District Judge. (8:16-cv-02456-GJH)

Submitted: September 14, 2017

Decided: September 19, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Gerard J. Stief, Associate General Counsel,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 17-1632

Doc: 12

Filed: 09/19/2017

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s orders dismissing this action alleging
discrimination in employment and a conspiracy concerning child custody and denying
her motions for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v.
Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 8:16-cv-02456-GJH (D. Md. July 19 &
Aug. 29, 2016; Mar. 13 & Apr. 28, 2017). We deny the motion for initial hearing en
banc and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2