Greg Walsh v. Specialized Loan Servicing


UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000107103-2] Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00591-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000185349]. Mailed to: Christina Walsh #483 5257 Buckeystown Pike Frederick, MD 21704 Greg Walsh #483 5257 Buckeystown Pike Frederick, MD 21704. [17-1670]

Download PDF
Appeal: 17-1670 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/02/2017 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1670 GREG WALSH; CHRISTINA WALSH, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC; US BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee of Chevy Chase Funding, LLC, Mortgage-Backed Certificates, 2005-1; MARK RUNKEL, Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, US Bank; P.W. PARKER, Vice Chairman and Chief Risk Officer, US Bankcorp, Vice Chairman, Defendants - Appellees, and THE LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY NADEL; JEFFREY NADEL; DOES 1 THROUGH 15, Inclusive, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00591-JFM) Submitted: October 19, 2017 Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Decided: November 2, 2017 Appeal: 17-1670 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/02/2017 Pg: 2 of 3 Greg Walsh; Christina Walsh, Appellants Pro Se. Aaron Drew Neal, MCNAMEE, HOSEA, JERNIGAN, KIM, GREENAN & LYNCH PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 17-1670 Doc: 16 Filed: 11/02/2017 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Greg Walsh and Christina Walsh appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their civil complaint as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walsh v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 1:17-cv-00591-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2017 & Apr. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?