Greg Walsh v. Specialized Loan Servicing

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [1000107103-2] Originating case number: 1:17-cv-00591-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [1000185349]. Mailed to: Christina Walsh #483 5257 Buckeystown Pike Frederick, MD 21704 Greg Walsh #483 5257 Buckeystown Pike Frederick, MD 21704. [17-1670]

Appeal: 17-1670

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/02/2017

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1670

GREG WALSH; CHRISTINA WALSH,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
SPECIALIZED LOAN SERVICING, LLC; US BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, As Trustee of Chevy Chase Funding, LLC, Mortgage-Backed
Certificates, 2005-1; MARK RUNKEL, Executive Vice President and Chief Credit
Officer, US Bank; P.W. PARKER, Vice Chairman and Chief Risk Officer, US
Bankcorp, Vice Chairman,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
THE LAW OFFICES OF JEFFREY NADEL; JEFFREY NADEL; DOES 1
THROUGH 15, Inclusive,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-00591-JFM)

Submitted: October 19, 2017

Before TRAXLER, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Decided: November 2, 2017

Appeal: 17-1670

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/02/2017

Pg: 2 of 3

Greg Walsh; Christina Walsh, Appellants Pro Se. Aaron Drew Neal, MCNAMEE,
HOSEA, JERNIGAN, KIM, GREENAN & LYNCH PA, Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 17-1670

Doc: 16

Filed: 11/02/2017

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Greg Walsh and Christina Walsh appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their
civil complaint as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Walsh v. Specialized Loan Servicing,
LLC, No. 1:17-cv-00591-JFM (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2017 & Apr. 26, 2017). We dispense
with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3